Stress and Coping Strategies among nursing students in Western Uttar Pradesh India: A Descriptive Study

 

Surat Ram Kudi1, Balamani S Bose1, Taniya3, Neha1, Amisha Saini1, Kusum Lata2*

1College of Nursing LLRM Medical College SVBP Hospital, Meerut U.P, India.

2Ch. Kehar Singh Educational Trust Baraut, Baghpat U.P, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: Kusum.bhardwaj.133@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: 70% nursing students suffering from high level distress due to the demanding nature of their education and training. This further affects their academic performance, learning outcome of the students, physical and mental health, quality of life, resilience and even leads to suicidal behavior. Aim of this study was to explore stressors and coping strategies among nursing students. Material and methods: A descriptive survey was conducted on 100 nursing students of medical college. Structured standardized measuring tool perceived stress scale and coping behavior inventory were used to assess stressors and coping behaviors of the nursing students. Pearson corelation (r) was used to find the correlation between stressors and coping behavior. Multivariate analysis was used to find association between stress level, coping behaviour and demographic variables. Result: Mean age of the participants was 20.53±2.1. 93% participants were female and 7% were male. 67% were doing BSc Nursing course and 33% were doing GNM. Overall mean stress score was 47.85±13.16.  Stress from taking care of patients, stress from the clinical environment and stress from teachers and nursing staff were highest source of stress. Overall mean score of coping mechanism was 38.08±8.14. Problem solving was the commonest coping mechanism used by participants against stressor. Conclusion: Students had higher stress from taking care of patient or environmental stress, so students should be prepared in simulation lab till they become skilled and confident to work on patient and clinical environment.

 

KEYWORDS: Coping Behavior, Perceived Stress, Students, Nursing.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Human being experience stress daily which further causes number of diseases.1 According to Selye, Stress is caused by environmental stimuli.2 When one body places demands on another, such placing one object on top of another, stress or anxiety is created in the physical environment that can lead to the collapse of the second object if it is unable to sustain the pressure from the first object.3 Similar to this, excessive or unmanaged stress can cause physical and mental breakdown in biological systems, including the human body, which can eventually have a negative impact on health.

 

 

Nursing students often experience high levels of stress due to the demanding nature of their education and training.4 Though nursing students are not responsible for care of the patient as registered nurse used to be. Nursing academics and clinical practices both are stressor for nursing students, Stressors for nursing students are academic workload heavy assignments and examination, engaging in various clinical activities, patient care, lacking nursing subjects knowledge and skills,  fear of failure, interpersonal relationships with faculty and nursing staff, and fear of unknown.5 Compared to other educational program nursing students have higher level of stress.6 Stress level among nursing students increasing.7

 

Stress in mild level can be motivating to students and it may further encourage the students to learn and can improve their academic performance and clinical skills. Studies have shown 70% nursing students suffering from high level distress.8 Evidences have shown that High level of stress affects emotional, cognitive and physiological domains.9 Distress further affect their academic performance, learning outcome of the students, physical and mental health, quality of life, resilience and  even leads to suicidal behavior.10

 

Students use various adaptive and maladaptive strategies. It includes adaptive coping strategies such as problem solving and actively facing the problems, ventilating emotions and asking for help, doing exercise or yoga, and positive thinking and maladaptive both.11,12 Some students also use maladaptive coping strategies such as consuming alcohol or drugs, avoidance of problem.4

 

Stress is an individual response. Stressor can vary person to person. It depends on the individual at which extent they will response to the stressor. Utilization of the adaptive coping strategies can help the students to cope with the stress.13 It is required to work on emotional and behavioural adaptation with changing and challenging internal and external situations. Stress and coping skills of nursing students is essential for supporting their mental health, academic success, and professional development. It helps to ensure that nursing students are well-prepared to enter the healthcare workforce as competent and resilient professionals. A stress is constant issue but response to stress and coping strategies can vary with generations. Researcher were interested to know about the stressors which affect nursing students of western U.P. India and coping strategies used by them to deal with those stressors. Aim of this study was to explore stressors and coping strategies among nursing students.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A descriptive survey was done to conduct this study. Based on the finding from meta-analysis, prevalence rate of stress among nursing students was 0.35% and considering 95% confidence interval and 5% precision, sample size was calculated.14 Calculated sample size was 6. Total 100 students were chosen using simple random sampling technique. Researcher had taken data from nursing students studying in college of nursing LLRM Medical college Meerut. Participants who were willing to participate, between the age 17-40 years and available during the period of data collection were selected. Participants who do not understand English language, suffering from physical and mental illness were excluded.

 

Measuring Tools:

Tool A: Self developed structured Socio- demographic Tool. This part consists of 13 items. Modified Kupa swami scale guidelines were followed for the development of the tool for socio demographic characteristics.15

 

Tool B: Structured Perceived stress scale (PSS). It is a five-point Likert scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2= sometimes, 3=fairly often, 4= very often) which has total 29 items and subdivided in six subscales i.e., Stress from taking care of patients, Stress from teachers and nursing staff, Stress from assignments and workload, Stress from peers and daily life, Stress from lack of professional knowledge and skills, Stress from the environment. The content validity index is 0.94.16

 

Tool C: Structured Coping behaviour inventory (CBI). It is a five-point Likert scale (0=never, 1 =Infrequently, 2= sometimes, 3=frequently, 4= always) which has total 19 items and subdivided in four subscales Avoidance, Problem Solving, Stay Optimistic, Transference. The Cronbach alpha for CBI was 0.76.16

 

DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:

The institutional review board approved the study. Participants were recruited using Simple Random sampling from BSc and GNM courses. The purpose of the study was explained to the participants and they were asked to withdraw from study anytime without having the fear of their academic grades being affected. Written informed consent was taken from the participants and unique identifier has been given to each participant. Participants were instructed that there is nothing right and wrongs responses, they have to choose the answers which is related to them. Researcher self-administered measuring tool one on one basis. Demographic data has been taken on the socio-demographic sheet. After administration of the socio-demographic sheet, participants were asked about their responses against Perceived stress scale and coping Behaviour inventory. It took 20 minutes to administer the measuring tools. At the end of data collection, participants queries have been cleared.

 

DATA ANALYSIS:

Data were analysed using SPSS version 20. Appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics was used for data analysis. For statistical significance p-value of <0.05. Mean score of the Perceived stress scale and coping behaviour inventory has been calculated. Frequency percentage of participants response against each item of Perceived stress scale and coping behaviour inventory has been calculated. Correlation between Perceived Stress Scale and Coping Behaviour Inventory has been calculated using Pearson’s correlation. Multivariate analysis has done to find association between demographic variable and Perceived Stress Scale and Coping Behaviour Inventory.

 

RESULTS:


Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants                                                                                                                     N=100

Demographic Characteristics of patients

Mean± SD

Age in years

20.53± 2.1

 

Percentage

Gender

Male

7

Female

93

Class

GNM

33

BSCN

67

Native Place

Rural

27

Urban

46

Semi urban

27

Religion

Hindu

90

Muslim

7

Other

3

Educational Status of father

Illiterate 

3

Primary School Certificate

7

Middle School Certificate 

8

High School Certificate 

17

Intermediate/ Post high school diploma

19

Graduate or post graduate, Professional or honours

46

Occupation

 

Unemployed

10

Elementary occupation

29

Plant & machine operators and assemblers, Craft and related trade workers, Skilled Agricultural and Fishery Workers, Skilled Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers

40

Clerks

2

Technician and associate professionals, Professionals

17

Legislators, Senior officials, and managers

2

Socio Economic Status

Upper

4

Upper Middle

47

Upper Lower

29

Lower Middle

18

Lower

2

Accompanied with

Alone

22

Dorn or roommate

41

With spouse

2

With parents

35

Average hours spend on studying per day

Hour or less

13

3-4 hours

55

5-6 hours

21

7 or more

11

Hours spent in didactic lectures per week

<20 hours

32

21-25 hours

30

26-30 hours

20

31-35 hours

18

Sleeping hours per day

<6 hours

23

7-8 hours

61

9-10 hours

10

11 or more

6

 


Table 2. Stressors Perceived by Nursing Students (N = 100)

Stress items

Item Ranking

Mean

SD

Overall PSS

 

47.85

13.16

Stress from taking care of patients

1

13.73

4.91

Stress from teachers and nursing staff

3

10.51

4.12

Stress from assignments and workload

6

4.95

2.90

Stress from peers and daily life

5

5.71

2.48

Stress from lack of professional knowledge and skills

4

7.29

3.43

Stress from the clinical environment

2

10.76

4.96

 


Table 1 shows sociodemographic characteristics of the participants. Table 2 depicts stressors perceived by nursing students using Perceived stress scale. Overall mean stress score was 47.85±13.16. Table 3 showing percentage distribution of the perceived stress among nursing students on Perceived Stress Scale.     


 

Table 3 Percentage distribution of the Perceived stress among nursing students on Perceived Stress Scale                                            N=100

Stress items

0

Never

1

Almost never

2

Sometimes

3

Fairly often

4

Very often

Stress from taking care of patients

Lack of experience and ability in providing nursing care and in making judgments

27

20

31

9

13

Do not know how to help patients with physio-psycho-social problems

12

33

27

15

13

Unable to reach one’s expectations

20

27

30

14

9

Unable to provide appropriate response to teacher’s and patient’s questions

11

36

28

9

16

Worried about not being trusted or accepted by patients or patient’s families.

23

30

20

11

16

Unable to provide patients with good nursing care

25

31

17

9

18

Do not know how to communicate with patients

22

21

27

18

12

Experience difficulties in changing from the role of a student to that of a nurse.

24

19

31

13

13

STRESS FROM ASSIGNMENT AND WORKLOAD

Worry about bad grades.

16

24

16

23

21

Experience pressure from the nature and quality of clinical practice.

15

20

16

27

22

Feel that one’s performance does not meet teacher’s expectations.

7

27

28

18

20

Feel that clinical practice requirement exceeds one’s physical and emotional endurance.

19

19

25

21

16

Feel that dull and inflexible clinical practice affects one’s family and social life.

12

28

17

26

17

STRESS FROM LACK OF PROFESIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS

Unfamiliar with the medical history and terms.            

28

12

25

12

13

Unfamiliar with professional nursing skills.

30

26

22

10

12

Unfamiliar with patient’s diagnosis and treatments.

18

23

21

30

8

STRESS FROM AREA OF PRACTICE

Feel stressed in the hospital environment where clinical practice takes place.

19

31

24

13

13

Unfamiliar with the ward facilities

13

16

38

16

17

Feel stressed from rapid changes in patient’s conditions.

17

22

29

15

17

Stress from peers and daily life

Experience competition from peers in school and clinical practice.

15

27

24

17

17

Feel pressure from teachers who evaluate students’ performance by comparison.

19

22

25

25

9

Feel that clinical practice affect involvement in extracurricular activities.

13

29

22

25

11

Cannot get along with peers.

25

25

22

21

7

STRESS FROM TEACHERS AND NURSING STAFF

Experience discrepancy between theory and practice.

14

37

24

14

10

Do not know how to discuss patient’s illness with teachers or nursing personnel.

23

26

20

13

18

Feel stressed because teacher’s instructions differ from one’s expectations.

15

33

25

12

15

Doctors lack empathy and are un-willing to help.

20

26

18

30

6

Feel that teachers do not evaluate students fairly.

18

29

32

15

6

Lack of care and guidance from teacher.

18

22

33

12

15


Table 4. Coping mechanism used by Nursing Students        N = 100

Coping mechanism

Item Ranking

Mean

SD

Overall

 

38.08

8.14

Avoidance

2

10.95

3.82

Problem Solving

1

12.36

4.00

Stay Optimistic

3

8.50

3.43

Transference

4

6.27

2.48

 

Table 4 showing Copying mechanism by Nursing Students to deal with stress. Overall mean score of coping mechanism was 38.08±8.14. Mean score of avoidance was 10.95±3.82, problem Solving was 12.36±4.00, stay optimistic was 8.50±3.43 and transference was 6.27±2.48. Table 5 showing percentage distribution of the coping behavior among nursing students on Coping Behavior Inventory.

 


Table 5 Percentage distribution of the coping behavior among nursing students on Coping Behavior Inventory                                  N=100

Coping Strategies

0

Never

1

Infrequently

2

Sometimes

3

Frequently

4

Always

Avoidance

To avoid difficulties during clinical practice

22

17

28

13

20

To avoid teachers

23

23

20

19

15

To quarrel with others and lose temper

32

27

18

14

9

To expect miracles so one does not have to face difficulties

28

17

16

18

21

To expect others to solve the problem

19

20

28

13

20

To attribute to fate

17

21

29

14

9

Problem solving

To adopt different strategies to solve problems

15

23

22

19

21

To set up objectives to solve problems

18

22

18

14

28

To make plans, list priorities, and solve stressful events

30

15

16

18

21

To find the meaning of stressful incidents

17

28

16

26

13

To employ past experience to solve problems

18

9

22

26

25

To have confidence in performing as well as senior schoolmates

19

21

17

20

23

Stay optimistic

To keep an optimistic and positive attitude in dealing with everything in life

21

21

17

18

23

To see things objectively

11

22

19

23

25

To have confidence in overcoming difficulties

19

22

25

18

16

To cry, to feel moody, sad, and helpless

14

19

17

23

27

Transference

To feast and take a long sleep

14

11

31

20

24

To save time for sleep and maintain good health to face stress

18

26

17

23

16

To relax via TV, movies, a shower, or physical exercises

16

24

21

17

22

 


Table 6.  Correlation among type of Stressors and Coping behaviours using Pearson corelation                                                             N=100

Stress items

Avoidance

Problem Solving

Stay optimistic

Transference

Stress from taking care of patients

-0.06

-0.07

0.02

0.02

Stress from teachers and nursing staff

0.31*

-0.16

0.03

0.03

Stress from assignments and workload

-0.10

0.35*

-0.01

-0.01

Stress from peers and daily life

-0.11

0.02

0.03

0.03

Stress from lack of professional knowledge and skills

-0.14

0.13

0.10

0.10

Stress from the environment

-0.10

0.33*

-0.06

-0.06

*Statistically significant at p<0.05

 


Table 6 showing corelation among type of Stressors and Coping behaviours. Pearson corelation (r) test was used to find the correlation. Statistically significance was considered at p<0.05. A positive weak corelation (r=0.31) was found between avoidance and Stress from teachers and nursing staff, problem solving and stress from assignments and workload (r=0.35) and stress from the environment (r=0.33). Multivariate analysis was used to find association between stress Level, coping Behaviour and Demographic Variables. A statistically significant difference was found between stress from taking care of patients and socio economic stress R2 0.32, F=1.83, at p=0.03, Stress R2= 0.33 F=1.83, p=0.02, stress from assignments and workload and socio economic status R2 0.17= F= 1.94, p=0.04, stress from peers and daily life and socio economic status R2 0.27= F= 2.709, p=<0.01, stress from lack of professional knowledge and skills and socio economic status R2 0.33 F=3.347, p<0.001), Education of father R2 0.27 F=2.159, p<0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between overall stress and socio- economic stress R2 0.54 F=1.731, p=0.02, hours spent in didactic lectures per week R2 0.51 F= 1.578 p=0.04.

 

A statistically significant association was found between avoidance and gender R2 0.26 F = 1.892 p= 0.03, socio-economic status R20.27 F =1.917 p= 0.03, average hours spend on studying per day R2 0.41 F =3.736 p= <0.001. A statistically significant association was found between problem solving and average hours spend on studying per day R2 0.33 F=2.223 p=< 0.01. A statistically significant association was found between stay optimistic and religion of participants R2 0.24 F =1.940 p= 0.03, average hours spend on studying per day R2 0.22 F = 1.803 p= 0.04.

 

DISCUSSION:

Understanding stress and the coping strategies employed by nursing students is crucial for developing interventions to support their well-being and academic success. In our study we found overall mean score of Perceived stress on Perceived stress scale was 47.85±13.16. Toqan et.al. found PSS overall mean score 41.2(SD = 19.5).17 In this study we found most common source of stress for nursing student was stress from taking care of patient was (M=13.73±4.91) followed by environmental stress (M=10.76±4.96), stress from teachers and nursing staff was (M=10.51±4.12), stress from lack of professional knowledge and skills was (M=7.29±3.43), stress from peers and daily life was (M=5.71±2.48) and stress from assignments and workload (M=4.95±2.90).  One study found common source perceived was stress from “taking care of the patients” (M = 11.4±0.85), followed by “stress from teachers and nursing staff” (M = 8.32±5.3) and “stress from assignments and workload” (M = 7.5±4.6).17

 

Ahmed et.al. found mean of stress related to patient care was 1.56±0.45, stress related to assignments and capacity was 1.60±043, stress related to deficiency of professional knowledge and competences was 1.24±0.45, stress related to the environment of practice was 1.47±0.49, stress related to peers and daily life events was 1.89±0.67, and stress related to instructors and nursing staff was 1.45±079.18 Hamaideh et.al found highest source of  stress teachers and nursing staff and assignment and workload.19 Chaabne et.al found clinical stressors as patient care, workload, assignments while academic stressors were lack of breaks course load and low grades.20

 

Overall mean score of coping behavior was 38.08±8.14. Toqan et.al. found overall mean score of coping behavior was M = 29.0±15.2.17 In our study coping strategy used by nursing students was problem Solving (M=12.36±4.00), followed by avoidance (M=10.95±3.82), stay optimistic (M=8.50±3.43) and transference was (M=6.27±2.48). This study findings are consistent with Toquan et al. found common coping strategy used by participants was problem-solving (M = 9.48±5.63), followed by avoidance (M = 8.84±5.74) and being optimistic (M = 6.35±3.96), while transference was the least commonly used (M = 4.36±3.02).17 While Ahmed et.al. found problem solving (M=1.84±0.67), stay optimistic (M=1.56±0.76), transference(M=1.34±1.20), avoidance (M=1.23±0.56).18 Chaabne et.al found nursing students use problem solving, regulation of emotions, ventilation of emotions as coping behavior.20 A positive weak corelation (r=0.31) was found between avoidance and Stress from teachers and nursing staff, problem solving and stress from assignments and workload (r=0.35) and stress from the environment (r=0.33). Ahmed et.al. also found corelation between avoidance and stress related to teachers and nursing staff, problem solving and stress related to assignments and workload and Stress from the environment.18

 

LIMITATION:

In this study we get the information about the nursing student stressor and coping behaviour at a single point of time as we used cross-sectional research approach. Secondly data has been collected from one nursing college which affects generalizability of study. Although we used randomization to choose participants but homogeneity was not there. We did not explored individual stressor and coping behavior other than standardized tool.

 

RECOMMENDATION AND IMPLICATIONS:

Longitudinal research can be used to assess students stress and coping behaviour. Qualitative study or mixed research approach can also be used to understand stressors and coping behaviour in depth. Students had higher stress from taking care of patient or environmental stress, so students should be prepared in simulation lab till they become skilled and confident to work on patient and environment. Teachers should deal with students one on one basis and their all doubts should be cleared.

 

CONCLUSION:

Most common source of stress for nursing student was stress from taking care of patient was followed by environmental stress from teachers and nursing staff was stress from lack of professional knowledge and skills was, stress from peers and daily life was and stress from assignments and workload. Coping behaviour used to deal with stress was problem Solving followed by avoidance, staying optimistic and transference.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

We are thankful to the participants for sparing their valuable time.

 

REFERENCES:

1.        Weiner H. Perturbing the Organism: The Biology of Stressful Experience. University of Chicago Press; 1992. 388 p.

2.        Selye H. The stress of life, Rev. ed. Oxford, England: Mcgraw Hill; 1978. XXVII, 515 p. 

3.        RSL, SF. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company; 1984. 460 p.

4.        Ching SSY, Cheung K, Hegney D, Rees CS. Stressors and coping of nursing students in clinical placement: A qualitative study contextualizing their resilience and burnout. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Jan 1; 42:102690.

5.        Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Gloe D, Thomas L, Papathanasiou IV, Tsaras K. A literature review on stress and coping strategies in nursing students. J Ment Health. 2017 Sep 3; 26(5): 471–80.

6.        Alzayyat A, Al-Gamal E. A review of the literature regarding stress among nursing students during their clinical education. Int Nurs Rev. 2014 Sep; 61(3): 406–15.

7.        Zhu Z, Xing W, Lizarondo L, Guo M, Hu Y. Nursing students’ experiences with faculty incivility in the clinical education context: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 1;9(2): e024383.

8.        Salvarani V, Ardenghi S, Rampoldi G, Bani M, Cannata P, Ausili D, et al. Predictors of psychological distress amongst nursing students: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Mar 1; 44:102758.

9.        Lavoie-Tremblay M, Sanzone L, Aubé T, Paquet M. Sources of Stress and Coping Strategies Among Undergraduate Nursing Students Across All Years. Can J Nurs Res. 2022 Sep 1; 54(3): 261–71.

10.      Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Papathanasiou IV, Edet OB, Tsaras K, Christos KF, et al. A cross-country comparative study on stress and quality of life in nursing students. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2018;54(4):469–76.

11.      Alshahrani Y, Cusack L, Rasmussen P. Undergraduate nursing students’ strategies for coping with their first clinical placement: Descriptive survey study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct 1; 69: 104–8.

12.      Lopez V, Yobas P, Chow YL, Shorey S. Does building resilience in undergraduate nursing students happen through clinical placements? A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Aug 1; 67: 1–5.

13.      Shdaifat E, Jamama A, AlAmer M. Stress and Coping Strategies Among Nursing Students. Glob J Health Sci. 2018 Mar 19; 10(5): p33.

14.      Zheng Y xue, Jiao JR, Hao WN. Prevalence of stress among nursing students: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 5; 101(31): e29293.

15.      Wani RT. Socioeconomic status scales-modified Kuppuswamy and Udai Pareekh’s scale updated for 2019. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun; 8(6): 1846–9.

16.      Sheu S, Lin HS, Hwang SL. Perceived stress and physio-psycho-social status of nursing students during their initial period of clinical practice: the effect of coping behaviors. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 Feb; 39(2): 165–75.

17.      Toqan D, Ayed A, Malak MZ, Hammad BM, ALBashtawy M, Hayek M, et al. Sources of Stress and Coping Behaviors among Nursing Students Throughout Their First Clinical Training. SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Jan 1; 9: 23779608231207274.

18.      Ahmed WAM, Mohammed BMA. Nursing students’ stress and coping strategies during clinical training in KSA. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2019 Apr 1; 14(2): 116–22.

19.      Hamaideh SH, Al-Omari H, Al-Modallal H. Nursing students’ perceived stress and coping behaviors in clinical training in Saudi Arabia. J Ment Health. 2017 May 4; 26(3): 197–203.

20.      Chaabane S, Chaabna K, Bhagat S, Abraham A, Doraiswamy S, Mamtani R, et al. Perceived stress, stressors, and coping strategies among nursing students in the Middle East and North Africa: an overview of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021 May 5; 10(1): 136.

 

 

 

Received on 23.07.2024         Revised on 08.11.2024

Accepted on 16.01.2025         Published on 28.02.2025

Available online from March 26, 2025

A and V Pub Int. J. of Nursing and Med. Res. 2025; 4(1):13-19.

DOI: 10.52711/ijnmr.2025.03

©A and V Publications All right reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.